Jyper vs Ezus
Ezus is a well-regarded trip-design and quoting platform for DMCs, travel designers and agencies: itinerary building, budgets, supplier records and branded proposals in one place.
An honest comparison by the Jyper team
Ezus helps your team build trips and budgets faster. Jyper builds them for you. Both give a DMC a modern back office — the difference is who sits at the keyboard.
If you have been evaluating Ezus, you already know the pitch, and it is a good one: pull your itinerary, budget, supplier records and a branded proposal into a single, modern tool instead of juggling Word, Excel and a shared drive. For a lot of travel designers, that is a real upgrade over the status quo.
The question this page answers is narrower and more useful than “which tool has more features.” It is: after you adopt Ezus, who actually does the work of answering a request? Because that is the number that shows up in your team’s week, your response times, and how many RFPs you can say yes to in high season.
Our answer is not that Ezus is bad software — it is that it is software. Jyper is a different category: an AI employee that reads the brief, sources your suppliers, costs the trip on your rules and hands back a proposal for your team to check. Below is the honest version of that difference, including where Ezus is the better pick.
Same back office. Different species.
Jyper includes everything you would expect from a modern DMC platform — CRM, supplier database, costing engine, proposal builder, operations hub — at no extra cost. But that is not what you are buying. Ezus is software your team operates. Jyper is an AI employee who joins your team and does the work itself.
| The work | With Ezus | With Jyper |
|---|---|---|
| Reading the incoming RFP | ManualYour team, line by line | Automatic on forwardJyper parses it the moment you forward the email |
| Building the itinerary | ManualYour team, inside the tool | AI-drafted, you reviewJyper drafts it from the brief — your team reviews |
| Sourcing supplier rates | Manual outreachYour team emails and chases suppliers | Automatic, with chasingJyper contacts your suppliers and chases the quiet ones |
| Costing & margins | Manual entryYour team fills the costing screen | Automatic, traceableJyper costs every line by your margin rules |
| Writing the proposal | Manual assemblyYour team assembles and formats it | Generated, you approveJyper generates it in your format — you check and send |
| Handling the revision | Manual reworkYour team edits every affected line by hand | Re-costed automaticallyForward the change; Jyper re-costs and re-issues |
| Keeping supplier rates current | When someone remembersYour team updates records when they remember | Filed automaticallyJyper files new rates from contracts and emails as they land |
| Follow-ups & deadlines | Human memoryYour team remembers (or doesn’t) | Scheduled routinesScheduled routines chase them automatically |
Workflow comparison reflects the standard operating model of team-driven software; verify specifics with each vendor.
What running Ezus actually looks like
An RFP lands in your inbox. Someone on your team reads it, decides on a program, opens Ezus, and starts assembling: days, services, supplier lines, margins, then the branded export. Ezus makes each of those screens quick and attractive — the drag-and-drop is nice, the templates save real time on formatting.
But notice what did not change. A person still read the brief and decided what to propose. A person still knew which supplier to use and at what rate. A person still clicked through every screen. Ezus compresses the minutes spent formatting; it does not remove the seat at the keyboard. Every request you answer still costs you a chunk of a skilled person’s day.
Where the hours really go
When DMCs actually time themselves, the proposal layout is rarely the bottleneck. The hours disappear upstream: decoding a vague or messy brief, deciding the program, emailing eight suppliers and waiting days for three of them to reply, then rebuilding the cost sheet when a rate comes back different from last season.
Ezus speeds up the part that was already the fastest — putting a tidy document together — and leaves the slow, human parts exactly where they were. That is why teams on modern quoting software still miss RFPs in peak season: the tool got faster, but the person is still the rate limiter.
What changes when the work does itself
With Jyper, the request arrives and a costed, on-brand proposal comes back for review — built from your suppliers, your rates and your margin rules, with every number traceable to its source. Your designer stops being the builder and becomes the editor and the closer: checking judgment calls, adding the human touch, and sending.
The practical effect is that your capacity stops being capped by how many trips one person can hand-build in a day. You can answer every request that comes in, including the small or unlikely ones you used to let slide — which are often the ones that quietly turn into repeat clients.
Ezus has a genuinely polished design-to-proposal workflow, its proposals look great, and if your team enjoys hands-on trip crafting inside a tool built for it, it is a fine choice. It is also mature, well-supported and pleasant to use — the kind of software people stop resenting. The catch is unchanged from any software: your people still do every step — reading the brief, building the program, pricing it, chasing suppliers. Faster screens, same workload.
Choose Ezus over Jyper if your team genuinely enjoys hand-crafting each itinerary inside a beautiful tool, your volume is comfortably within what your people can build by hand, and design control matters to you more than reclaiming the hours. Ezus is a fine home for that way of working. Jyper is for teams that want the answering to happen without a person driving every step.
Common questions
Yes — though the honest framing is that they are different categories. Ezus is software your team operates; Jyper is an AI employee that does the operating. Jyper includes a full back office (CRM, supplier database, costing engine, operations hub) at no extra cost, but you are not buying screens — you are hiring the work.
No. Jyper's included platform covers the same day-to-day ground — client and supplier CRM, supplier rate and contract database, multi-currency costing, proposal builder and operations tracking — and the AI employee operates it for you. Customers run the whole quote-to-delivery workflow on Jyper alone; the only systems they keep are their existing email and their accounting software.
No. Jyper works from the data you already have — forwarded emails, supplier contracts, past quotations in Excel. There is no migration project, no training plan, and your team keeps working in the inbox they already use. During the Zero-Setup Launch we ingest 30–50 of your past deals as-is and turn them into your AI employee, so it arrives already fluent in how you quote.
Yes. Every proposal Jyper builds waits for your review before anything reaches a client, every number is traceable to its source, and the full platform is there whenever you want to open it — or take a file over yourself.
One plan, commission based — we get paid when you get paid. You get unlimited seats, no usage limits, and the full platform included, with a done-for-you launch and a 30-day money-back guarantee. We only invoice a commission on business you confirm through Jyper, set with you on a call. Details at jyper.ai/pricing.
Jyper generates proposals in your own template and brand, so the output matches what you already send. Because everything waits for your review, your team can refine any proposal before it goes out — you get the polish of a designed document without a person assembling it from scratch each time.
No. There is no migration project — Jyper learns from your past quotations and supplier contracts as they are, and your team keeps working from the inbox. Most teams run their first Jyper-built proposals within days of the Zero-Setup Launch, so you are not choosing between a working tool now and a payoff months away.